Metal thickness for little tabs?

A forum about all aspects of the construction and maintenance of the Billy Dawson inspired modified Hatz Classic biplane. Here is the place to ask your questions and get the answers from the real experts.
orchardair
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 4:56 pm

Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by orchardair »

Builders,
What thickness did you use for the little tabs which hold the formers:
tabs.JPG
??
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Hatz Classic plans# 136
painless
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:39 pm

Re: Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by painless »

.125"
Jeff Orear
Hatz Classic #138
Peshtigo,WI
https://eaabuilderslog.org/?s=Patients
orchardair
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 4:56 pm

Re: Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by orchardair »

Thanks Jeff.
That seems like too thick to me, especially since I believe all the vertical posts these tabs are welded to are only 0.035" thick. But I really do appreciate your input!
Hatz Classic plans# 136
painless
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:39 pm

Re: Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by painless »

Agree with you on the thickness. I only reference the size from having them waterjet cut off the CAD drawings available from the HBA, and .125" pieces is what I got. Thing is, those two tabs are all that holds each bulkhead, which all the stringers are attached to. Best to overbuild it I guess.

I see our plan numbers are two apart. 138 vs 136. Build on, brotha! :D
Last edited by painless on Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Jeff Orear
Hatz Classic #138
Peshtigo,WI
https://eaabuilderslog.org/?s=Patients
User avatar
Bitshifter
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:12 pm
Location: Avondale Pa
Contact:

Re: Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by Bitshifter »

I made mine .125 also and tapped them 8/32.
Ed White
HC 154

"In life 10% wrong is failure, in school it's an A"
mmarien
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 9:50 am
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CANADA

Re: Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by mmarien »

That tabs for the spar fittings on drawing 06 were 125. So I just had forty tabs waterjet cut from the same material. Probably overkill. 0.125 seems excessive to hold the formers now that you question it. The wing fittings are only 090 and they hold the wing ??? When I get the 050 material cut I may just have another forty tabs cut from that. If somethings going to fail, it's probably the 035 tubing not the thicker tabs.
Murray Marien - HC 0180
Saskatoon Canada
User avatar
Bitshifter
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:12 pm
Location: Avondale Pa
Contact:

Re: Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by Bitshifter »

It might be over kill but it sure holds them good :)
Ed White
HC 154

"In life 10% wrong is failure, in school it's an A"
1964m20e
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:35 am

Re: Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by 1964m20e »

Just curious could you use AN742 Adel clamps?
Not to plans but would it work?
User avatar
Bitshifter
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:12 pm
Location: Avondale Pa
Contact:

Re: Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by Bitshifter »

I actually thought about that and I can see no reason why it wouldn't. I do think that the brackets are easier though. I have taken the formers off a couple of times and having threads in them is much easier than futzing with Adel clamps and hardware. Remember that you have to fish your hand and wrench in between the fuselage and the formers, squeeze the clamp,line up the holes, get the nut and washer on...
Ed White
HC 154

"In life 10% wrong is failure, in school it's an A"
orchardair
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 4:56 pm

Re: Metal thickness for little tabs?

Post by orchardair »

Thanks all.
I think I'll go with 0.050". I have some left over from other parts water-jet cut. You really only need 16 of these tabs.
Hatz Classic plans# 136
Post Reply