Yep, the single float option is my personal favorite. The Grumman Duck, the Vought O2U-1 and O2U-4 (think Stearman on a solo float with outriggers) are historical examples. ("Seaplanes of the World", by Bill Yenne, Barnes and Nobles Books) I think the water handling of the single float on the step would be better than the dual float config. Unfortunately, the landing gear track for dry ops will probably be closer together for this option than for the dual float option, so hard surfaced operations handling would probably be better with the dual float option. It certainly would be easier to implement with two off-the-shelf amphibious floats.I've played with solo float amphibious layouts that give me a conventional tail dragging config, like the Duck, and also unconventional configs with a main tire and tail wheel in the factory float, which would require having retractable wheels in the outriggers-- like the config for the U2. There are options for buying an amphibious float with the single main gear and tailwheel already engineered (tell me that THAT's not a plus....), so I'd only have to configure some relatively lightly loaded outrigger gear. The wheels used in in-line skates are pretty robust, and with the correct crank ratios, a couple of electric car window regulators would crank them up and down for a known weight penalty.. If they failed in the up position, land on the water, or into the wind on a grass field. I flew a Schweitzer K-8 (single place sailplane), and got pretty good at landing on the one wheel, and rolling to a stop, staying balanced. Then a puff of breeze would knock me of balance and it would set down on a wingtip.
Now, if I'm going to put landing loads up into the lower wing spars....I gotta do the math.
I've obviously have spent two much time dreaming about this..
Keep the forum alive. Thanks to Doug for making this possible, and to Thayer for keeping it going.
Caasi